Google has confirmed that page speed is a ranking factor. More importantly, faster sites convert better: a 1-second delay reduces conversions by 7%. Most performance issues are fixable in a week — but only once you know exactly what they are.
What We Analyse
- Core Web Vitals: Largest Contentful Paint (LCP), Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS), and Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
- Time to First Byte (TTFB) and server response time
- Image optimisation: format, compression, lazy loading, and sizing
- JavaScript and CSS: render-blocking resources, bundle size, and unused code
- Caching: browser caching headers, server-side cache, and CDN configuration
- Third-party scripts: load order, async/defer usage, and performance impact
- Font loading strategy: system fonts, font-display, and FOUT prevention
- Mobile vs desktop performance gap analysis
What You Receive
- Performance scorecard for mobile and desktop with real-world and lab data
- Developer-ready fix list with specific files, settings, and code changes
- Root cause analysis for each failing Core Web Vital
- Third-party script audit: what to keep, defer, or remove
- Estimated load time improvement for each recommended fix
Who This Is For
Developers, SEO managers, and site owners whose Google PageSpeed score is below 70 on mobile, or whose bounce rate is high and site speed is a suspected factor.
What Happens After Your Audit?
Once you read through your audit report, the choice is completely yours — you can implement every fix yourself, hand the findings to your own team, or reach out to us if you would like hands-on help. There is no obligation and no pressure.
If you would like our team to help fix the issues identified in your audit, we are happy to discuss it. Our implementation and fix-it services are available from $99 to $499 depending on the complexity of the project — you only pay for what you actually need.
We keep our audit prices this low because we believe in one simple principle: when you grow, we grow. This is a long-term relationship, not a one-time transaction.
Carlos Mendez (verified owner) –
Sceptical at first but the depth of the audit genuinely surprised me.
George Nakamura (verified owner) –
Comprehensive without being overwhelming. The priority ranking is what makes it so useful.
Rosa Vargas (verified owner) –
The annotated screenshots made it incredibly easy to brief my dev team.
Simone Dubé (verified owner) –
Useful report. Found 4 genuinely new issues and confirmed 2 things we already suspected but hadn’t prioritised. The confirmation alone helped justify the dev time.
Fraser Campbell (verified owner) –
Found some genuinely useful issues I wouldn’t have caught myself. Took a star off because one finding didn’t apply to our platform, but the rest were excellent.
Michael Torres (verified owner) –
We’ve tried a few different audit services this year. This was by far the most actionable. The others gave us long reports full of recommendations — this gave us a ranked priority list we could actually work through.
Anna Svensson (verified owner) –
Did exactly what it said. Happy with it.
Sonia Kapoor (verified owner) –
Better than I expected tbh.