You can publish the best content in your niche and still rank on page 3 if your technical foundation is broken. Crawl errors, incorrect canonicals, missing sitemaps, and slow load times all compound over time — silently costing you rankings and traffic.
What We Analyse
- Crawlability: robots.txt, crawl budget, and blocked resources
- Indexation: noindex tags, canonical errors, and duplicate content
- Site architecture: URL structure, depth, and internal linking
- XML sitemap: completeness, errors, and submission status
- Core Web Vitals: LCP, CLS, and INP across mobile and desktop
- Redirect chains and loops consuming crawl budget
- Structured data / schema markup implementation and errors
- Hreflang and international SEO configuration
- Mobile-first indexing readiness
What You Receive
- Full technical SEO audit report with issue severity ratings (Critical / High / Medium / Low)
- Developer-ready fix list with specific code or configuration changes required
- Crawl report showing which pages are indexed, blocked, or orphaned
- Core Web Vitals scorecard with root cause analysis for each failing metric
- Structured data validation report with corrected markup
Who This Is For
SEO managers, developers, and site owners who suspect technical issues are limiting their organic rankings — or who want a clean foundation before investing in content.
What Happens After Your Audit?
Once you read through your audit report, the choice is completely yours — you can implement every fix yourself, hand the findings to your own team, or reach out to us if you would like hands-on help. There is no obligation and no pressure.
If you would like our team to help fix the issues identified in your audit, we are happy to discuss it. Our implementation and fix-it services are available from $99 to $499 depending on the complexity of the project — you only pay for what you actually need.
We keep our audit prices this low because we believe in one simple principle: when you grow, we grow. This is a long-term relationship, not a one-time transaction.
Yuki Tanaka (verified owner) –
My developer was able to work from this directly without coming back to me for clarification — which is exactly what I needed.
Marcus Dean (verified owner) –
Mixed feelings. The top findings were useful but the rest felt filler.
Divya Iyer (verified owner) –
Overall a positive experience. Delivered within the promised timeframe and the findings were mostly very actionable. Took off one star because the competitive benchmarking section could have been more specific to our niche.
Tariq Mahmood (verified owner) –
Good stuff overall. Minor quibble but nothing major.
Luke Patterson (verified owner) –
Sceptical at first but the depth of the audit genuinely surprised me.
Laura Holt (verified owner) –
Good audit. Found some things I already knew but the rest made it worthwhile.
Patricia Okafor (verified owner) –
The audit was thorough and the priority rankings were helpful. I’d give it 5 stars but a couple of the findings were things any developer would have noticed eventually anyway. The ones I didn’t know about definitely made it worth ordering.